gay & lesbian humanist magazine

Volume 27, Number 1, February 2009

February 2009

Detailed Contents
Listing


Contents Shortcuts:

Cover

Editorial

Feedback

News

World Watch

On the Blog

Blogwatch

Harold Blackham

Audio

Letter from
America

IWD 2009

Dignity

Prince Harry

Enter the Enforcer

Islam Watch

Dubai

Murder Rapping

The Pope

Women and Sharia

Doubt

Living Proof

Barack Obama

Karl Gorath

Morality

Harold Pinter

Edward Carpenter

Blackham's Best

Airings

Gossip

Steven Dean

Toons

Letters

What's On

 

 

 

 
 
 

About us I Links I Search I Archive I Contact I Help us

 

The paranoid Pope

 

What are we to make of Joseph Ratzinger’s latest condemnation of gays, in which he said that man needed protecting from homosexuality just as much as the tropical forests needed protecting from destruction? George Broadhead has been looking at the Pope’s pronouncement, and pronounces it paranoid.

 

The Pope’s latest homophobic outburst is clear evidence of paranoia. And the Pink Triangle Trust (PTT) said as much in its well-received news release in December, after Pope Ratzinger had declared that saving humanity from homosexual behaviour was as important as saving the rainforests from destruction.

“The church has a responsibility for creation,” he said in a holiday address to the Curia, the Vatican’s central administration, “and must demonstrate this responsibility publicly [. . .] It must also protect man against destruction by himself. It is necessary for there to be something like an ecology of man. This is not an outdated metaphysics, if the Church speaks of the nature of the human being as man and woman and asks that this order of creation be respected.”

Ratzinger went on, “Here we are dealing with the fact of faith in the Creator and paying attention to the language of creation, the disrespecting of which would be a self-destruction of man and thus destruction of the work of God. What is often understood by the word ‘gender’ finds its resolution in the auto-emancipation of man from creation and from the Creator.

Man wants to [. . .] control everything that concerns him. But in this way he lives against the creator. The tropical forest deserves our protection, but no less than man as creation [. . .]”

Outrageous and bizarre

This must be the most outrageous and bizarre claim yet made by the Pope, who has already got a well-deserved reputation as one of the most viciously homophobic world leaders on a par with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran and Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe.

The Vatican has already reinforced its antigay reputation by strongly opposing a UN declaration calling for an end to discrimination against gays (see “World Watch”), but this latest papal outburst is clear evidence of an obsession about homosexuality, which is tantamount to paranoia.

Pope Paranoid:

Natzinger
preaches hate.

I was pleased to see that the PTT’s news release was picked up by a fair few outlets among the gay press and the Independent (see links below), and my colleague Andy Armitage featured a (rather irreverent) piece on the Pink Triangle blog, which seized on the Pope’s call for responsibility and said, “Ratzo is a fine one to talk of ‘responsibility’. The responsibility is on humans not to procreate at the moment, not to have as many babies as it’s humanly possible to have. These people obviously find it hard to see that the planet is burgeoning with life, and it’s becoming unsustainable.”

Shameful

Ratzinger had spoken of the “destruction of God’s work”, which the blog thought was shameful:

“As for that ‘destruction of God’s work’, this is just gratuitously insulting. Ratzo really should hang his head in shame – better still, do the decent thing and shoot himself.

“Trouble is, one puff of white smoke and there will be an equally bigoted excuse for a human being to take his place. Which wouldn’t be so bad if the media didn’t continue to legitimise his comments by treating them as news, without severely bollocking him in their leader columns.”

The leader of Roman Catholics in England and Wales, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, claimed the Pope’s words were being misinterpreted and “difficult to interpret”, but I fail to see how else one might interpret the view that gay men are destroying God’s work by following their nature and, as they say, doing what comes naturally.

The Pope, a former Hitler Youth member, demonstrated his Nazi-esque ideology
when he said in his Xmas message that
gays pose a threat to mankind.
© Scott/Pink Paper.

When Ratzinger says, “The tropical forests do deserve our protection” followed by, “But man, as a creature, does not deserve any less”, how is that to be interpreted except as a statement that mankind deserves our protection as much as the rainforests do, and that protection is against homosexuality?

The PTT’s response was widely covered, including by the Independent, Pink Paper, Rainbow Network, Pink News and IHEU.

 

 

click here to go to top of page

All Content © Copyright Pink Triangle Trust 2009. All Rights Reserved.