gay & lesbian humanist magazine

Volume 27, Number 6, October 2009

October 2009

Detailed Contents
Listing


Contents Shortcuts:

Cover

Editorial

Feedback

News Watch

World Watch

On the Blog

Blogwatch

Martyn Andrews

Fairies

Good

Code Comfort

Sshh! Saturdays

Gaytheist

Other Europe
Part 3

Out of Print

Gossip

Airings

Toons

Letters

 

 

 

 
 
 

About us I Links I Search I Archive I Contact I Help us

 

The other side of Europe
Part 3

 

“Lesbians and gays, bisexuals and transgender people live with discrimination and exclusion throughout Europe. Homophobic violence and disrespect are daily events,” reports Colin de la Motte-Sherman in the last of his three-part series looking at life for LGBT people in European states. Click to see Part 1 and Part 2.
 

Macedonia

Ninoslav Mladenjovicz, a lawyer, and (then) president of the Macedonian Human Rights Group (CCHR), made a point at a 2004 conference in Skopje that is still true for many “new” and potential members of the EU.

“On April 1st 2001 Macedonia signed the agreement for association and stability with the EU which called for yet another process of the implementation of standards typical of these Western-centred international associations. Therefore, the recent Macedonian legislation has been one of artificial incorporation of prescribed, ready-made laws from the West into the Macedonian legal system.

“As well-meaning as they might be, these laws simply do not reflect either the will or the awareness the Macedonian people. If a law has been passed in the Macedonian parliament, it does not necessarily mean that there has been general approval in the public of what this law implies [. . .]”

In connection with an advertising campaign based on money from the US and Sweden, the then Macedonian President, Boris Trajkovski, said, “We have many more pressing issues that the money could be used for. This is deeply offensive to most people in Macedonia, which represent a very conservative mix of the Orthodox Christian and Muslim faiths.”

Mosque in Skopje

Mladenjovicz again: “People in Macedonia find it difficult to comprehend that homosexuality exists in Macedonia. Since the protection of the rights of homosexuals is rooted precisely in those laws, which are generally believed to have been imposed by the West, it is a frequent standpoint that homosexuality as a phenomenon has itself been imported for the west [. . .] Homosexuals still live in constant fear of humiliation, public insult and physical attack.”

In a questionnaire conducted by the Helsinki Foundation in Skopje, it was found that the first major problem is that only 48 per cent of the population think that sex and even sexual orientation should be talked about. When other questions were asked, 64 per cent considered that homosexuality is a disease.

Protective wall

While 75 per cent thought people should have freedom to make their own choices – among what they considered normal, healthy sexual orientations, not “diseases” – 55 per cent of the people thought homosexuals should be moved to a “Departement” or that they, the “normal” ones, should have a wall built around them so that they can be “protected” from homosexuals.

The Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, in the dry language of an official report, writes:

Since same-sex consensual relations were decriminalised and the age of consent was made equal for homosexual and heterosexual sex in 1996, the atmosphere and attitude towards LGBT persons in “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” has improved. However, certain persisting discriminatory attitudes exist at all levels, and legal safeguards are insufficient. Legal protections against discrimination remain particularly weak. Currently, there are limited specific legal protection provisions available for discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation but not on the basis of gender identity.

 The Law on Military Service, which prohibited homosexuals from serving, has been amended. A recent addition to the Law on Work Relations prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. The LGBT community, however, consider the terminology used in the labour law not fully in accordance with the term “sexual orientation” as used by the European Court of Human Rights.

Georgi Ivanov, while presidential candidate of the ruling conservative VMRO DPMNE party (he won on the 2nd round in April 2009), has said, “Our system discriminates against no one. Homosexuals stigmatise themselves and think they are in an underprivileged position.”

Asked to comment on the same issue, Ljubomir Frckoski, the candidate backed by the main opposition party, the Social Democrats, said he supported all groups that faced discrimination. “In general, I support the pluralism of lifestyles of the subculture groups,” he said. “This is one of the cornerstones of today’s society.”

Deviant lifestyle choice

Homosexuality is a taboo subject across the largely conservative and patriarchal societies of the Balkans, where many people view it as a deviant lifestyle choice or at best as a mental illness. Sociologists say homophobia is widespread and stems in part from preoccupation with national identity, the idolisation of aggressive masculinity and the revival and increased influence of religion, which led to, and fed from, the conflicts and unrest of the past two decades.

The leader of the Association for Free Sexual Orientation, Koco Andonovski, said discrimination against gays and lesbians was widespread in the country, mentioning attempts to treat homosexuality with hormone pills and banning homosexuals from entering some bars and cafés. Officials say that an antidiscrimination law, one of the preconditions for Macedonia’s EU accession, was in the works and should be passed this year.

Romania

“One of the major problems in Romania . . . is that Romania is an Orthodox country where, after the revolution of 1989 and the end of the communist period, a lot of people discovered God – or think that they did – and the Orthodox Church is very strong, very strong,” says Vera Ceampanu of ACCEPT, a Romanian LGBT rights organisation.

“That is why the politicians and the members of parliament – although Romania is not a religious country (= theocracy) – ask for permission from the Church when they want to pass legislation to which they know the Church could object.

Educational campaigns

“For years one of the arguments used as to why they didn’t repeal repressive legislation was, that is against the wishes of the Church, and against the tradition and the moral fibre of the Romanian people.”

The National Council to Combat Discrimination was set up to implement the antidiscrimination law. Its role is to prevent discrimination (through methods such as educational campaigns); to serve as a mediator to reduce and eliminate discrimination in concrete situations; to investigate and apply sanctions (warnings or fines) in cases of discrimination, including both those cases it identifies itself and those filed by individuals or organisations; to monitor parties involved in a discrimination case; and to provide assistance in filing a discrimination complaint with the council.

In 2005, the mayor of Bucharest initially refused to authorise an LGBT march in his city, but an international campaign by ACCEPT and public intervention by government officials (including the President of Romania, the Minister of Justice and the National Council to Combat Discrimination) prompted the mayor to change his mind and authorise the march in 2005, as well as in 2006 and 2007.

March for Diversity

However, during the 2006 and 2007 marches the neo-fascist group Noua Dreapta, the Conservative Party (represented in Parliament), and the New-Generation Party participated in parallel “Normality Marches”. Moreover, in 2006 and 2007 the government tolerated the display of neo-fascist symbols, although they are banned in Romania.

May 2008, ACCEPT successfully organised another LGBT march, March for Diversity, in the capital Bucharest. More than 200 people marched under police protection to support equal rights and against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. For the fourth consecutive year, ACCEPT also organised a week-long Gay Fest festival in Bucharest, while the neo-fascists and conservatives organised an opposing March for Normality.

The existing laws against discrimination cover not only employment issues, but also access to services, to health, education etc., since it applies to all human rights and fundamental freedoms or rights recognised by Romanian legislation, in the political, economic, social and cultural field or in any other domains of public life.

The antidiscrimination law does not include gender identity and expression, and the law on equal opportunities between women and men does not cover transgender status. As a result, transgender people are not explicitly protected in Romanian law.

Kosovo

The European Union has given its blessing to Kosovo’s constitution, saying it is in line with international standards and guarantees.

Article 24 (Equality Before the Law)

1.     All are equal before the law. Everyone enjoys the right to equal legal protection without discrimination.

2.     No one shall be discriminated against on grounds of race, colour, gender, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, relation to any community, property, economic and social condition, sexual orientation, birth, disability or other personal status.

But laws are, as ever and everywhere, one thing; the reality in the streets another.

Traditional societal attitudes about homosexuality have intimidated most gays and lesbians into concealing their sexual orientation. Gays and lesbians have generally felt insecure, with many reporting threats to their personal safety. There have been fewer threats reported than in previous years; however, this may have been due to greater caution taken by gays and lesbians. The print medium has at times reinforced negative attitudes by publishing articles about homosexuality that characterised gays and lesbians as mentally ill. At least one political party, the Islamic-oriented Justice Party, included a condemnation of homosexuality in its political platform.

Violence and discrimination against homosexuals is a problem. The Centre for Social Emancipation, a local NGO promoting lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender rights, said there were a number of other cases of discrimination against homosexuals during 2008 but that victims refused to allow it to present their cases publicly out of fear of discrimination. According to a US State Department report in February this year, at least one gay who went public had to flee the country in danger of his life.

Further, although there are laws against discrimination based on sexual orientation, the report talks of the very bad application of these laws. Homophobia is to be found in the media and in public opinion and many gays are not aware of the protection that antidiscrimination laws could give them. Many also fear discrimination and stigmatisation and many don’t dare take part in the activities of gay organisations. This means that many cases of violence are committed by state authorities.

According to the lesbian rights organisation Labris, 65 per cent of gay respondents claimed they had experienced violence due to their sexual orientation. Only 10 per cent had reported the violence to the police.

Denied equal opportunities

According to a Kosovo gay person at a conference I attended in Skopje in September 2003, “What we are lacking in Kosovo is the access to proper psychological counselling and mental health. This is why if you go to the website of our Gay Kosovo Association [. . .] you will see that we have devoted a lot of our space and time to psychological issues. In other aspects of health [. . .] there is a problem due to the fact that people cannot openly admit to the doctor that they are gay. That means they will not be able to get specific advice related due to their lifestyle.”

There are also reports that homosexuals have been denied equal opportunities in education and employment. A survey by the Youth Initiatives for Human Rights indicated that lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgender people experienced widespread threats, hate speech, verbal assault and physical violence.

The age of consent is 14 regardless of sexual orientation and/or gender.

Moldova

In May 2008, participants of the Pride parade in the capital of Moldova, Chisinau, were attacked by violent members of the neo-fascist movement New Right. Fifty participants were held in a bus surrounded by several hundred aggressive protestors shouting, “Beat them to death” and “Don’t let them escape.”

After being forced by the neo-fascists to destroy their pride materials – colourful balloons, posters with antidiscrimination slogans and flags of the EU – the Pride participants’ bus was eventually allowed to go. The police merely observed the violence and attacks and did not intervene.

Bosnia and Herzegovina

At the start of the Sarajevo Queerfestival in Sarajevo in September 2008 some of the participants were exposed to violent attacks by demonstrators. The festival organisers decided after Day One to close the festival due to the violent attacks.

“The lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rights activists and the participants of the Sarajevo Queer Festival continue to receive death threats,” said an Amnesty International statement in 2008. “On 25 September one of the main national dailies, Dnevni Avaz, published the names of all individuals who were injured in the attack that took place on 24 September after the opening of the festival. The names were then published in two other dailies – Oslobodjenje and Nezavisne Novine.”

Bulgaria

Between the two world wars Bulgaria was quite unstable politically with a phases such as a dictator-farmer; a “democracy” without parties and a king who governed. The country came under the political and economic influence of Nazi Germany. After 1944, and the Russian Army conquered the country and a communist regime was established, which only “abdicated” in 1990. Thus there is no great fund of experience for a democratic development and the honouring of human rights – also for LGBT people.

The Republic of Bulgaria is a parliamentary democracy with a population of approximately 7.6 million. Legislative authority is vested in the unicameral National Assembly (Narodno Sabranie). The country is ruled by a coalition government headed by a prime minister. Presidential elections held in 2006 were deemed generally free and fair. Municipal elections held in October 2007 were marred by reports of unprecedented vote buying.

Police abuse

While civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of law-enforcement organisations, there were some instances in which law-enforcement officers acted independently.

The government generally respected the human rights of its citizens; however, there were problems in several areas, among them police abuse, which included beatings and other mistreatment of pretrial detainees, prison inmates and members of minorities; harsh conditions in prisons and detention facilities; arbitrary arrest and detention; and impunity.

There were increasing limitations on freedom of the press; there was discrimination against nontraditional religious minorities; and there was widespread corruption in the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government. Other problems included violence against women and children, substandard education for Romani children, harsh conditions in state-run institutions for children, trafficking in persons, discrimination against persons with disabilities and discrimination against minority groups.

Homophobia also sits deep in the consciousness of a majority of the population. The majority of Bulgarians (70 per cent) are Orthodox Christians, but the Church is not quite as influential as it is elsewhere – since it is split, thus is not so monolithic.

Established family values

However, in a statement, the Orthodox Bishop of Varna points out that the Bible defines homosexuality as a sin, that same-sex relationships are a disease and an unnatural condition resulting from “original sin”.

“Such public appearances promote immorality and try to supplant the established family values. We do not denounce and despise these people but we denounce the sin of homosexuality, and its scandalous advertising,” the statement said.

According to the research, 80 per cent of all Bulgarians have negative attitudes towards gay people, whereas 59 per cent are extremely homophobic. Seventy per cent of the respondents would not send their children to a school with a gay teacher, and 50 per cent would not work with gay people.

Gemini – the national LGBT organisation – is conscious that to change the stereotype thinking on which homophobia is based will take time and demand much work. The law that made homosexual acts no longer punishable was passed in 2002 and came into effect in 2004. Since then, one of Gemini’s aims has been to fight for change and make the changes known.

The media are not helpful here. When Gemini called a press conference to explain the changes, instead of showing speakers dressed in suits, pictures of drag queens and gay parades from the West were shown. Thus they support the typical stereotype thinking of the majority of the population.

But there is progress. The law for the prevention of discrimination was worked out with the help of 14 Bulgarian NGOs – including Gemini. The intention is to ensure an effective antidiscrimination law with equality in judicial processes and equal opportunities to take part in Bulgarian public life.

Discrimination in employment

However, according to a US State Department report, “the government did not effectively enforce this prohibition. Reports of violence against sexual minorities were rare, but societal discrimination, particularly discrimination in employment, although less common than in previous years, remained a problem [. . .] Gemini reported that individuals continued to be reluctant to pursue legal remedies [. . .].”

Despite the establishment of an antidiscrimination commission, judicial and police bodies do not show any eagerness to collect evidence about the homophobic motives of those who perpetrate crimes. Judges are not obliged to consider such motives as aggravating the circumstances of guilt or to impose more severe punishments when homophobic motives are present. Discriminatory attitudes of police officers towards sexual minorities are no different from discrimination against any other minorities. The passive behaviour of the police shows a desire to ignore the violation of the rights of LGBT people.

On 28 June 28 2008 about a hundred participants marched under tight security in the country’s first Gay Pride parade. Police arrested around sixty nationalist protestors attempting to disrupt it. Those arrested were mostly representatives of extremist groups who were throwing stones, bottles, squibs and at least one Molotov cocktail at the procession. The leader of the nationalist extremist Bulgarian National Union (BNU), Boyan Rasate, was also arrested, allegedly for taking part in the attempted violence.

The BNU had been among the strongest opponents of the gay parade, and even launched a campaign under the motto: “Be Intolerant, Be Normal” with posters spread all over Sofia.

The head of the Christian Orthodox Church and the Muslim chief mufti condemned the march, calling it immoral and referring to homosexuality as a disease.

The road to tolerance and equality is seldom straight (!) or short.

Scientifically proven

Did you hear this one? In 2005, the newspaper Duma, a paper close to the social democrats, asserted that homosexuality is caused by bad housing conditions – and this has, if you believe it, been scientifically proven.

The age of consent is 14, according to Article 149. However, Article 151(2) has a provision for those who are over 14 and do “not understand the characteristics or the importance of the act.”

Poland          

Until the repeated carving up of Poland between Tsarist Russia, Prussia and the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the country had been a multinational, multireligious country – and even after the national resurrection in 1918 it remained so. Almost a third of the population of Warsaw in 1925 were Jewish.

During the years of foreign occupation and division, however, the Catholic Church – without being, as an organisation, pro-revolutionary – kept alive the idea of “a Poland” and a Polish nation. It thus established itself in the minds of the majority – if you are Polish you are a Catholic – and thus has a special status in the life of a majority of Poles. This was not always the case, and has intensified since 1945. Before then, the Catholic Church was the largest religious grouping – among several.

Poland is a republic with a multiparty democracy and a population of approximately 38.5 million. The bicameral National Assembly consists of an upper house, the Senate (Senat), and a lower house (Sejm). Executive power is shared among the prime minister, the Council of Ministers, the president, and the Sejm. The October 2007 preterm National Assembly elections and the 2005 presidential election were both free and fair. Civilian authorities generally maintained control of the security forces.

Excessive use of force

According to the 2008 human-rights report of the Poland Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labour, published in February this year, the government generally respects the human rights of its citizens; however, prison conditions remain poor and overcrowded; lengthy pretrial detention, misconduct and excessive use of force by law-enforcement officials have continued to be problems. The judicial system is inefficient and continues to function poorly.

Occasional anti-Semitic violence and harassment are also problems. Corruption remains a problem throughout the government and society. There has been discrimination against women in the labour market, sexual exploitation of children, trafficking in women and children and societal discrimination and violence against ethnic minorities and homosexuals. Violations of workers’ rights and antiunion discrimination have also been problems, says the report.

And the economic crisis will not help matters. The Business Portal for Poland said in April:

Latest macroeconomic data provide mounting evidence of an economic slowdown in Poland. February saw a continuation of a sharp decline in industrial output, and retail sales registered an annualised fall for the first time in four years. The effects of weaker economic activity are feeding through into the labour market, with slackening labour demand, rising unemployment and slower wage growth.”

Although Poland abolished anti-homosexual laws in 1932, between 1945 and 1990 the state, as well as the church, regarded homosexuality as a kind of treason against the country and the Christian religion. Shortly after the “changes”, groups were formed, often under the name of Lambda, in many cities in Poland, but most of them died within a few years. Lambda Warsaw was founded 1997, has a social centre and is publicly active, as is Lambda Sczeczin.

The Campaign Against Homophobia (KpH) is the active national LGBT organisation. It takes part in discussions against homophobia, in the media and in politics, and tries to improve the public’s opinion of homosexuals.

Public good

The Campaign Against Homophobia was established in 2001 and is officially recognised as an organisation for the public good. The association works for the equal treatment of bisexual, homosexual and transgender people in Poland. KpH has local branches in Kraków, Lublin, Szczecin, Silesia, Warsaw and other major centres.

Kraków march in 2007: participants are
protected by large numbers of police.

Karolina Bregula, a heterosexual photographer who has studied in Sweden thought that her country needed some enlightenment in the matter homosexuality. She took innocuous photographs of lesbian and gay pairs holding hands against a neutral urban background. With the KpH, they became a publicity campaign.

The poster-photos were put up – but didn’t stay there for long. Catholic groups (especially the League of Polish Families – Liga Polskich Rodzin) protested loud and long. The photo-posters were meant to be seen in the four largest Polish cities – but they met so much hatred, rejection and destruction that it was called off.

In 2002 one of the major dailies in Poland Gazeta Wyborcza, started a debate about homosexuality. The newspaper stressed the stereotypes: homosexuality is against nature, against morals; the gay movement is a plot to mislead the young generation down the path to hell; it is a world conspiracy of gays; and so on.

People use umbrellas against a rain of stones,
eggs and apples in Kraków, 2004.

However, awareness does grow. A report on gay activism and homophobia in Poland by Agnieszka Graff said:

There has been a surprising shift in the public discourse within two or three years, from invisibility – to almost daily headlines in 2005 and 2006. It is true that the majority of gays and lesbians in Poland still lead a “double-life”, but the homosexual is at the centre of an increasingly polarised public debate. This activity, the development of queer studies in Poland, and the intensive, and mostly homophobic, public debate can only be understood in the historical and political context of hopes and fears about Poland’s place in Europe.

Lesbian Coalition (LBT), Poland’s first autonomous lesbian group, is well known for street theatre, and in Warsaw a transgender group has been started, known as Transfujsia.

Laws

Poland has transferred the EU Directive 2000/78/EC into Polish law via the Employment Relations Act, which came into force in 2003. Daily life shows that almost 2 million Polish gays and lesbians are frequently discriminated against but are mostly afraid of obtaining justice through the courts.

“Whoever shows pornographic materials in public, so that it is forced upon people who do not want to see it, will be punished with a fine or partial loss of freedom, or imprisonment for up to one year,” says Interpol. It is however, apparently applied with some finesse. One wonders how the opponents of marches for tolerance and equality get away with pictures like this.

Homophobic posters of dubious quality!

The age of consent in Poland is 15, but if someone over 18 “sleeps” with someone under 15 (with or without consent) only the older person is punished.

Summing up

Lesbians and gays, bisexuals and transgender people live with discrimination and exclusion throughout Europe. Homophobic violence and disrespect are daily events. In most EU states, same-sex pairs do not enjoy the same rights and protection as heterosexual pairs, and are therefore discriminated against and disadvantaged – for instance, in terms of access to social services such as health and pensions.

A new phase in the fight for equality in the workplace is emerging for LGBT people and their employers in much of central and Eastern Europe, continuing a fight that is still in progress in Western Europe.

Sixty per cent of regulations and laws are made in Brussels. The ministers and parliamentarians come from various states with different ideas of justice, morals and democracy. They influence the decisions made by the EU. With the opening of the employment market, and many workers fleeing their own countries for better wages and work conditions, it is now concretely in our own interests to give every possible assistance to LGBT people and others in central and Eastern Europe working for a better, more tolerant, democratic and less corrupt society there.

It has been – and will be – a long struggle costing energy, money and time. Who knows? Perhaps it is something that will accompany us, like anti-Semitism for centuries. That is all the more reason not to neglect the fight now – or history may come close to repeating itself.

 

 

click here to go to top of page

All Content © Copyright Pink Triangle Trust 2009. All Rights Reserved.